One of those hands...
Aug. 16th, 2006 10:55 pmPlaying as East, both sides vulnerable:
S:AQJT9xxx
H:A
D:Kx
C:Ax
South passes. I open 4S, and we make exactly.
Why, you ask? There are 7 trump winners with, say, the Q forcing the K, and AQJT9 is enough to force them all out, even if one opponent has all five. The two aces take, and the K almost certainly takes, and partner may have something (though getting over there will be tricky.
It was glorious. I also went 3-0 on the night, which helps.
S:AQJT9xxx
H:A
D:Kx
C:Ax
South passes. I open 4S, and we make exactly.
Why, you ask? There are 7 trump winners with, say, the Q forcing the K, and AQJT9 is enough to force them all out, even if one opponent has all five. The two aces take, and the K almost certainly takes, and partner may have something (though getting over there will be tricky.
It was glorious. I also went 3-0 on the night, which helps.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-17 03:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-17 11:25 am (UTC)In this case, 4S is the worst you can do -- if partner has any of the AD, KC, or KS, you have a good shot at slam... 4S cuts off those opportunities, and it doesn't seem to me like there's any harm in looking for them.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-17 01:38 pm (UTC)As it so happens, the opener doesn't lead to the missing ace of diamonds and we make all 13 tricks. Gah.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-17 01:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-17 02:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-17 10:18 pm (UTC)It'd be nice if there were a way to end up in Gerber (not that West knew Gerber), rather than Blackwood, so you can theoretically get info on the A and K before committing to more than 5S, but I just don't see it. 2 NT is a gamble - partner likely goes to 3NT with anything (and partner had the hearts to say 3NT), but that's too risky - getting stuck in 2 NT is dangerous because it'd be much harder to reestablish control.