Are you kidding me?
May. 28th, 2007 12:41 pmHaddonfield teens going to extremes
I heard some stories from when I was that age but not involved in that scene, but nothing like this. And I'd heard some stories about younger generations, but this is a few steps beyond that. There never was much accountability, and I guess from there it's not too hard to have things go downhill, and fast. It's good to see someone making a stand, but I wonder how much parents' attitudes of "it couldn't be my kid, don't punish my kid" will hinder the whole process.
I heard some stories from when I was that age but not involved in that scene, but nothing like this. And I'd heard some stories about younger generations, but this is a few steps beyond that. There never was much accountability, and I guess from there it's not too hard to have things go downhill, and fast. It's good to see someone making a stand, but I wonder how much parents' attitudes of "it couldn't be my kid, don't punish my kid" will hinder the whole process.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-28 05:00 pm (UTC)The solutions they mentioned at the bottom of the article seem unlikely to succeed, if I recall how I thought 7 years ago. What is needed is serious consequences, as in not-going-to-that-elite-college-after-all, explain-to-your-employer-your-criminal-record, two-summer-jobs-to-pay-the-fine consequences.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 12:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 02:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 02:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 05:04 pm (UTC)But yes, I can imagine the level of entitlement bitchism that comes out of these parents.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 01:05 am (UTC)I suppose that a few of them might start paying attention after some of their peers are screwed, but who will be screwed? I'm not going support my kids being screwed so that someone else can learn their lesson early and head on to Yale and so on, and neither is everyone else.
What we really need is a combination of a drinking age of 18 and parent and family dynamics that are open and supportive and not conducive to wild parties behind people's backs. This would involve changing the common approach to parenting and also youth culture, but it would be worth it.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 02:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 03:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 05:10 pm (UTC)I also think you're underestimating the effect of stories about the guy who "set up that party last year, and dude, he went to jail for a couple months...I think he was a senior, but now he's living in his parents' house...yeah, I saw him working at Crate and Barrel last week..."
no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 12:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 12:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 02:09 am (UTC)Of course, it's generally pretty hard to get kicked out of public school, and it's pretty easy to sit in the back, never say anything, and pull a C as long as you're not actually falling asleep in class.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 02:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-29 03:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 03:06 am (UTC)Aaaanyway, yes, it would be nice if privileged white rich kids didn't face different consequences for crimes than everyone else. It would also be nice if they had any IDEA how privileged they were, but I'm not holding my breath.
Also, just like anywhere else, privileged or not, kids are going to do stupid shit if they're bored and aimless. They need something to do, some kind of community, and some kind of involvement with the outside world. Of course, if I remember my former fellow residents correctly, most of them had no desire to interact with the outside world...
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 03:08 am (UTC)